1.8 KiB
AI assistance
I am an AI-assisted systems developer. I use automation to scale how much I can build, but I still own the architecture, the constraints, the integration and the final result.
For Nereus, the main assistants were Codex CLI and Claude Code CLI, using GPT-5.6 Sol and Sonnet 5.0. Some application code, infrastructure configuration and documentation were drafted or implemented by those tools. Other parts were written by me. The agents handled a lot of the repetitive implementation work; I decided how the system should fit together, reviewed the changes and ran them against the real environment.
The debugging process was also mixed. I investigated some failures manually through logs, metrics, packet paths and command-line tools. Some research came from Google and official documentation. Other problems were handled through AI sessions or longer Codex loops that inspected the current failure, changed one thing, reran the check and continued until the system reached the expected state.
Most of the difficult failures were not application-code problems. They were networking and integration details: firewalld blocking VXLAN, permissions on pod log files, missing RBAC verbs, incorrect image tags, stale buoy IDs after a database reset and Prometheus windows that still contained earlier errors. Those are the parts I debugged on the actual hosts and cluster. An AI-generated configuration was never treated as working just because it looked correct.
I am responsible for the final project. AI helped type, research and iterate;
the architecture, acceptance criteria, hardware debugging, system integration
and final review remained mine. The checks that actually passed are recorded in
docs/evidence.md, and anything still dependent on external hardware or
credentials is marked honestly in docs/roadmap.md.